The 2nd Ward endorses candidates by a majority vote of its committeepeople. The 2nd Ward’s endorsement committee conducts thorough research into candidates and makes endorsement recommendations to the whole Ward based on questionnaires, interviews, and candidate forums. For judicial candidates, the endorsements committee also reviews Bar Association materials.
US President/Vice President
Placeholder
US Senate
US House District 3
PA Attorney General
PA Auditor General
PA Treasurer
Placeholder
Superior Court
Commonwealth Court
PA Senate District 1
Placeholder
PA House District 175
PA House District 182
City Commissioner
District Attorney
City Controller

Judicial Retentions
The 2nd Ward Democrats endorse voting YES to retain all judges.

Anne Marie Coyle
The Second Ward recommends voting NO on this judicial retention.

Paula Patrick
The Second Ward recommends voting NO on this judicial retention.

Ballot Question No. 1
Should The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter be amended to create the Office of Homeless Services Ombudsperson to assist residents experiencing homelessness, help provide fair access to essential resources, improve quality of life in the shelter system, investigate client complaints, and provide oversight and recommendations to the City’s providers of homeless services?
The Second Ward recommends voting YES on this ballot question.
Homelessness is an important issue in Philadelphia; however, City Council continues to receive significant complaints and concerns from recipients, the public, and providers on the quality and adequacy of homeless services. In order for the City to fulfill its duty to meet the needs of the homeless, the Office of the Homeless Services Ombudsperson shall act as an advocate for Philadelphians experiencing homelessness and their families. Such advocacy may pertain not only to broader issues of law, policy, practice, and resources, but also to individual judicial, administrative and investigative matters, grievances and complaints. This Office will provide necessary oversight and accountability for the City’s provision of homeless services.

Ballot Question No. 3
Shall The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter be amended to provide for the creation of an independent Philadelphia Prison Community Oversight, Board and Office of Prison Oversight and to further authorize City Council to determine the composition, powers and duties of the Board and Office?
The Second Ward recommends voting YES on this ballot question.
The Office of Prison Oversight will promote the safety, health and well-being of incarcerated people by increasing transparency and accountability regarding the operation of the City’s correctional facilities. It will provide advice and recommendations regarding how best to promote the just, transparent and efficient administration of correctional facilities in Philadelphia. The office will be funded by an allocation of 0.45% of the Dept of Prisons appropriations.
The Philadelphia Community Oversight Board will be an independent board comprised of 9 members with at least one member being a formerly incarcerated person and shall not be employees of the Prisons, Sheriff’s office or Phila Police Dept. The Board will assist the Office of Prison Oversight in carrying out its duties of investigation, including grievances filed against the Department.

Ballot Question No. 2
Should the Home Rule Charter be amended to increase the minimum amount that must be appropriated for spending on Housing Trust Fund purposes in the City’s operating budget each year?
The Second Ward recommends voting YES on this ballot question.
The City of Philadelphia’s Housing Trust Fund (HTF) is dedicated to the development of new affordable housing opportunities, for the preservation and repair of existing housing, and for homelessness prevention. This charter change fixes a loophole that deprived the HTF of receiving funds from the developers’ Payments in Lieu of providing affordable housing.
Since 2018, the mixed income program enables developers to increase the density of their projects beyond the base zoning – by either building price-restricted affordable housing or paying the city. If the developers opt to make a payment “in lieu” of creating the affordable units, that money is supposed to go toward housing programs funded through the Housing Trust Fund. But nothing was binding about the arrangement, meaning the money can be used elsewhere.
The charter change would effectively close that loophole. The charter amendment provides that “an amount equal to total receipts by the City in the preceding calendar year of payments made in lieu of providing affordable housing” shall be appropriated for expenditure out of the Housing Trust Fund.

































